Library
РУС ENG

Documents

Library
Documents
Forum's publications
  • Library
  • Documents
  • Forum's publications
Global Security Through Nuclear Non-Proliferation. 10th Anniversary Album of the Luxembourg Forum

Global Security Through Nuclear Non-Proliferation. 10th Anniversary Album of the Luxembourg Forum

Arms control: Burden of Change

Arms control: Burden of Change

Edited by Dr. Viatcheslav Kantor, 2019

Preventing the Erosion of Strategic Stability

Preventing the Erosion of Strategic Stability

2018

Topical Issues of Nuclear Non-proliferation

Topical Issues of Nuclear Non-proliferation

Paris, 2018

Revitalizing Nuclear Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

Revitalizing Nuclear Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

Moscow, 2017

Preventing the Crisis of the Nuclear Arms Control and Catastrophic Terrorism

Preventing the Crisis of the Nuclear Arms Control and Catastrophic Terrorism

Washington, 2015

Reykjavik summit: lessons for the future of US-Russian relations

Reykjavik summit: lessons for the future of US-Russian relations

Moscow, 2016

The limits of secure nuclear tolerance

The limits of secure nuclear tolerance

Moscow, 2014

Secure tolerance criteria for the nuclear non-proliferation regime

Secure tolerance criteria for the nuclear non-proliferation regime

Montreux, 2013

Perspectives of nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament

Perspectives of nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament

Geneva, 2012

Contemporary problems of nuclear non-proliferation

Contemporary problems of nuclear non-proliferation

Berlin, 2012

Manifesto on secure tolerance

Manifesto on secure tolerance

Achievements and prospects of non-proliferation and disarmament

Achievements and prospects of non-proliferation and disarmament

Washington, D.C., 2010.

Prospects for non-proliferation and disarmament

Prospects for non-proliferation and disarmament

Vienna, 2010

Results of the 2009 Prepcom and the prospects for the 2010 NPT Review Conference

Results of the 2009 Prepcom and the prospects for the 2010 NPT Review Conference

Geneva, 2009

Load more
First Declaration of the Youth Group of the International Luxembourg Forum: New Voices

First Declaration of the Youth Group of the International Luxembourg Forum: New Voices

The International Luxembourg Forum on Preventing Nuclear Catastrophe (ILF) has initiated a new project on establishing a Youth Group of the Forum. The Group will comprise of young professionals from different countries that have an understanding of, and interest in, the issues of arms control, nuclear non-proliferation and security. While the final composition of the Group has not yet been established, its first participants have already had a chance to meet and work together within the framework of the annual ILF Supervisory Board Meeting held in Geneva, December 4-5, 2019

Final Declaration of the Supervisory Board meeting of the International Luxembourg Forum. Geneva, December 4-5, 2019

Final Declaration of the Supervisory Board meeting of the International Luxembourg Forum. Geneva, December 4-5, 2019

Understanding that 2020 will be decisive for the nuclear arms control system and consequently for strategic stability, recognizing the efforts of the above mentioned organizations to prevent nuclear catastrophe and having deliberated as a conference on June 4-5 in Rome and as a Supervisory Board on December 4-5 in Geneva, we propose the following Road Map for these most urgent actions

Final Declaration of the Conference of the International Luxembourg Forum "Arms Control: the Burden of Changes". Rome, June 4-5, 2019

Final Declaration of the Conference of the International Luxembourg Forum "Arms Control: the Burden of Changes". Rome, June 4-5, 2019

Final declaration of the 10th Anniversary International Luxembourg Forum conference in Paris, October 9-10, 2017

Final declaration of the 10th Anniversary International Luxembourg Forum conference in Paris, October 9-10, 2017

The participants of the 10th Anniversary Conference of the International Luxembourg Forum on Preventing Nuclear Catastrophe wish to communicate their extreme concern about the present state of international security

Final Declaration of the Supervisory Board of the International Luxembourg Forum "Ensuring Breakthrough In Nuclear Disarmament and Non-Proliferation".

Final Declaration of the Supervisory Board of the International Luxembourg Forum "Ensuring Breakthrough In Nuclear Disarmament and Non-Proliferation".

London, 2016

Final Document of the Joint Conference of the International Luxembourg Forum on Preventing Nuclear Catastrophe and the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI)

Final Document of the Joint Conference of the International Luxembourg Forum on Preventing Nuclear Catastrophe and the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI)

Washington, 2015

Resolution 2231 (2015), adopted by the UN Security Council and its 7488th meeting, on 20 July 2015

Resolution 2231 (2015), adopted by the UN Security Council and its 7488th meeting, on 20 July 2015

Final Document of the Conference of the International Luxembourg Forum on Preventing of Nuclear Catastrophe

Final Document of the Conference of the International Luxembourg Forum on Preventing of Nuclear Catastrophe

Stockholm, 2015

Final declaration of the Supervisory Board of the International Luxembourg Forum on Preventing Nuclear Catastrophe

Final declaration of the Supervisory Board of the International Luxembourg Forum on Preventing Nuclear Catastrophe

Prague, 2014

Declaration of the Round Table of the International Luxembourg Forum “Towards Progress In Nuclear Arms Control, Disarmament and Non-Proliferation”

Declaration of the Round Table of the International Luxembourg Forum “Towards Progress In Nuclear Arms Control, Disarmament and Non-Proliferation”

Geneva, 2014

Declaration of the Supervisory Board of the International Luxembourg Forum on Preventing Nuclear Catastrophe

Declaration of the Supervisory Board of the International Luxembourg Forum on Preventing Nuclear Catastrophe

Warsaw, 2013

Final declaration of the International Luxembourg Forum Conference “Safe Tolerance Criteria for Nuclear Non-proliferation Regimes”

Final declaration of the International Luxembourg Forum Conference “Safe Tolerance Criteria for Nuclear Non-proliferation Regimes”

Montreux, 2013

Final Document of the Conference of the International Luxembourg Forum on Preventing of Nuclear Catastrophe

Final Document of the Conference of the International Luxembourg Forum on Preventing of Nuclear Catastrophe

Geneva, 2012

Declaration of the Fifth Anniversary Conference of the International Luxembourg Forum “Contemporary Problems of Nuclear Non-Proliferation”

Declaration of the Fifth Anniversary Conference of the International Luxembourg Forum “Contemporary Problems of Nuclear Non-Proliferation”

Berlin, 2012

Declaration of the Supervisory Board of the International Luxembourg Forum.

Declaration of the Supervisory Board of the International Luxembourg Forum.

Moscow, 2010

Load more

Bill Potter On Prospects For Us-Russia Cooperation Under Biden

CNS Founding Director Dr. William Potter spoke with the International Luxembourg Forum on Preventing Nuclear Catastrophe about the future of Russian-US cooperation on nonproliferation under the new Joe Biden administration

Nonproliferation.org | #PRESS

Trump Still Has His Finger on the Nuclear Button. This Must Change

The time has come to take the nuclear football away from this president-and all the presidents that come after him Anyone who watched the disturbing events on Capitol Hill and President Donald Trump’s outrageous role as ringleader of the riot, must comprehend a crucial and terrifying fact: The president of the United States is unhinged and a threat not only to democracy, but to our survival.

Politico.com | #PRESS

Missile Defense and the Arms Race

Within weeks of taking office, President Joe Biden and his team will be confronted with dozens of pivotal choices. An under-the-radar but consequential decision facing the new administration will be whether and how to move forward with Trump-era plans to expand the U.S. national missile defense footprint with new sea-based missiles that can shoot down long-range ballistic missiles.

Daryl Kimball | ARTICLE

Evaluating the State of Nuclear Danger in Southern Asia

China, India, and Pakistan are building out force structures. China and India are moving forward to employ their own assets in space that can be employed for nuclear as well as conventional warfare. Pakistan is likely to rely on commercial observation satellites and China for these purposes. Missile defense capabilities face a host of problems, and yet India is deploying them, much to Pakistan’s discomfort. There is ample evidence that the trend line of deterrence strengthening measures is growing steadily in Southern Asia

South Asian Voices, Michael Krepon | #PRESS

Restoring the Effectiveness of the JCPOA: Principles and Approaches. A View from Russia

The irreversible aspects in connection to the restoration of the JCPOA include the additional centrifuge knowhow and engineering expertise acquired by Iran and new “non-nuclear” sanctions imposed by the US, which may be impossible to lift for domestic political reasons. The uncertainties on the political horizon will impose a narrow time frame for achieving at least a limited early success. It is important that all the parties abide by a certain set of principles

Russia in Global Affairs, S. Batsanov and others | #PRESS

Why the Pentagon must think harder about inadvertent escalation

The conventional capabilities that have enabled the United States to reduce its reliance on nuclear weapons have also increased the risk of misperception that could spark a nuclear war. The Pentagon’s newly released response is titled “Managing Risks of Nuclear Escalation.” This document is deeply concerned with one particular escalation risk: that the United States’ nuclear-armed adversaries — Russia, China and North Korea — may underestimate U.S. resolve or capabilities

Defense News, Ankit Panda and James Acton | #PRESS

Why Was Iran’s Top Nuclear Scientist Assassinated?

The assassination of Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, the leader of Iran’s suspended program to develop nuclear weapon capabilities, was less about preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons than it was about embarrassing the current Iranian government and impeding it from negotiating a rapprochement with U.S. President-elect Joe Biden’s incoming administration. The best that can be practically hoped for now is that Iranian leaders will resist temptations to play into the hands of the assassins and instead explore with Biden’s administration mutual steps to revive the JCPOA

George Perkovich, Carnegie Endowment | #PRESS

Revitalizing Nonproliferation Cooperation With Russia and China

​The record of the global nuclear nonproliferation regime has been impressive, defying dire predictions of a world with many nuclear-armed states. Since North Korea acquired nuclear weapons nearly 30 years ago, no additional country has done so. Many factors explain that positive record, but one of those factors has been the ability of the United States to work constructively with Russia and China from time to time in support of shared nonproliferation goals.

Arms Control, Robert Einhorn | ARTICLE

Trump Failed to Achieve his Iran Goals: Fitzpatrick

Mark Fitzpatrick, an associate fellow at the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), says Donald Trump achieved “none of his goals” by quitting the 2015 nuclear deal, noting that Trump “only made the situation more dangerous.”

Tehran Times, Mark Fitzpatrick | ARTICLE

Living With the Nuclear Prohibition Treaty: First, Do No Harm

The UN Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons will neither rid the world of nuclear weapons nor leave it more vulnerable to war, despite the hopes and fears of its staunchest proponents and opponents.

George Perkovich | ARTICLE

5 Steps for the Next President to Head Off a Nuclear Catastrophe

To the horror of experts, 30 years after the Cold War, the global risk from nuclear weapons is actually getting worse. Here’s how a new administration can turn that around As fires rage across the West and the coronavirus continues its deadly march, President Donald Trump tweets and fulminates but refuses to take charge. He denies climate change; on the pandemic, he leaves to the states his clear responsibility to protect the people of America.

Politico.com, Edmund Brown, Ro Khanna, W. Perry | #PRESS

The Extension of a Nuclear Treaty Between the U.S. and Russia Would Be a Crucial, Responsible Step

George P. Shultz served as secretary of state (1982 to 1989) and treasury secretary (1972 to 1974). William J. Perry, former defense secretary (1994 to 1997), is founder of the William J. Perry Project on the threat of nuclear weapons. Sam Nunn, former Democratic chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee (1987 to 1995), is co-chairman of the Nuclear Threat Initiative

The Washington Post | #PRESS

Nonproliferation Trends. What’s News, What’s True?

It should be possible for the United States and Russia to reiterate in one fashion or another the basic tenet that a nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought. If they are unable to lend their support to this fundamental principle, any comments they might make about the enduring value of the NPT at the next Review Conference will have a hollow ring, writes William C. Potter, Director of the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies (MIIS)

Valdaiclub.com, William Potter | ARTICLE

Distrust between Russia and the United States at Unprecedented Level

Kommersant, Igor Ivanov | ARTICLE

US Has no Legal Standing to Trigger UN Sanctions on Iran

In an interview with Mehr News Agency, The Executive Director at US Arms Control Association Daryl Kimball noted that the US has no legal standing to trigger UN sanctions on Iran.

MEHR News Agency, Daryl Kimball, Hamid Bayati | #PRESS
Load more

of